Exact(2)
In general, colonization scores were higher in C57BL/6 mice compared to BALB/c mice (P = 0.0016 for fundus; P = 0.0035 for antrum).
Although not statistically significant, colonization scores in infected BALB/c mice tended to drop in the course of time (P = 0.18 for fundus; P = 0.08 for antrum), whereas a tendency to increase was observed in the antrum of Mongolian gerbils (P = 0.15).
Similar(58)
Since invasive candidiasis occurred only in <5% of patients who had Candida colonization score of <3, the likelihood of developing invasive candidiasis in such patients was considered very low.
Patients with high candida colonization index scores can be considered to be at high risk for candida infection or are already infected.
Vascular colonization was scored according to the frequency of successful reisolation in stem sections arranged in four height classes measured from the stem base: 15-30 mm, 30-45 mm, 45-60 mm and 60-75 mm.
The conclusions of Hall and colleagues [ 1], even if valid only in their institution, suggest that the most relevant tool for accurate detection of candida in SAP is the candida colonization index score.
A Candida Colonization Index Score (CCIS) was calculated for each patient using the methods described [ 8] as follows: CCIS = ratio of the number of non-blood distinct body sites colonised with Candida spp to the total number of body sites cultured.
Colonization and inflammation scores of infected groups of different animal strains were compared pairwise using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, using time as a stratification factor and a Bonferroni adjusted significance level of 0.05/3 = 0.0167.
No differences in sebum levels, microbiological colonization and skin scores were found.
Colonization was generally scored two weeks after inoculation.
On the first section, the H. suis colonization density was scored, as shown in Table 1, according to the Updated Sydney System [28] after immunohistochemical staining using a polyclonal genus-specific rabbit anti-H.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com