The phrase "colonization for" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is often used to talk about the purpose or goal of colonization, or the reason behind it. Example: The European powers saw colonization as a means of gaining resources and expanding their empires, but for the indigenous people, it meant loss of land and culture. Colonization for economic gain often resulted in the subjugation and exploitation of native populations.
Based on pooled analyses, the model-estimated median time to clearance was 88 weeks after documented colonization for MRSA-colonized patients and 26 weeks for VRE-colonized patients.
The bone microenvironment favors tumor cell colonization for cancers such as breast, prostate, lung, renal, and colon [ 54].
Furthermore, with successful decolonization for most colonizers, no significant difference was found between the patients with and without MRSA colonization for subsequent MRSA infection, though the size of the patient's number was small.
In Colonization, for example, his game about the discovery of the Americas, there is no mention of slavery.
And when Jefferson suggested that emancipation would require colonization for freed slaves, he employed racist arguments for separation that Americans would subsequently embellish to justify slavery's persistence.
Like Kelso, Kupperman, a historian at New York University who has written about early American colonization for two and a half decades, attributes Jamestown's eventual success not to unrelenting investors or slave labor or the price of tobacco but to the hard work of "ordinary colonists".
Results: The SS1-inoculated mice showed persistent H. pylori colonization for 12 weeks.
This "moonshine," says Feldman, could allow "a modest amount of colonization for centuries".
This "Clovis first" view of the initial colonization of the Americas was the dominant paradigm for American colonization for decades.
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and likelihood ratios of digestive colonization for ESBL-E in respiratory sample in the two centers.
Micro-patterned surfaces demonstrated reductions in microbial colonization for a broad range of species, with up to 99.9% (p < 0.05) reduction compared to un-patterned controls.
