Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
A key point here is that CEA identifies priorities through a collective judgment process.
Thus the collective judgment process provided additional insights that would help shape a more complete research strategy to support future CEAs of nanomaterials.
By using a collective judgment process with diverse experts and stakeholders (explained below) to examine the above three elements, CEA helps address challenges related to scope and transparency.
Using a diverse group of individuals in a structured collective judgment process to evaluate this information not only would potentially expand the coverage of the document but would, as explained above, increase the transparency of the assessment.
Similar(56)
Although some details vary among case studies, the collective judgment step of the CEA process used groups of about 25 individuals who were selected to represent a range of technical fields (manufacturing, environmental fate, exposure, ecology, toxicology, risk management, etc).
CEA affords such a record not only in the framework document as a catalogue of information considered for the assessment, but in the collective judgment aspect of the CEA process.
By using a formal procedure that provides an explicit record of key facts, values, and other information cited by the participants themselves and, even more importantly, an objective measure of the participants' collective judgment of priorities, such as a rank-order list derived from a multivoting process, the CEA process makes the resulting assessment much more transparent.
The process of disclosure, debate, and the public fashioning of collective judgment are vital methods through which we make sense not only of new forms of cruelty but of past crimes as well.
Collective judgment based on diverse perspectives is a key feature of the CEA process.
What unwitting processes are at play when we determine merit, for this too involves collective judgment by decent folk acting "objectively".
It makes the collective judgment more extreme.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com