Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
collections of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "collections of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a group or assortment of items that are gathered together, often for a specific purpose or theme. Example: "The museum features collections of ancient artifacts from various cultures around the world."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Science
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
55 human-written examples
Five collections of gene sets were collected.
Science
He devoured collections of sports stories.
News & Media
Museums were simply collections of objects.
News & Media
Collections of his letters are also extant.
Encyclopedias
Collections of his drawings enjoyed wide popularity.
Encyclopedias
Companies are just collections of people.
News & Media
Ōoka also published several collections of essays.
Encyclopedias
Most universities have collections of rare books.
Encyclopedias
There are several collections of art.
Encyclopedias
Collections of great political speeches?
News & Media
THE permanent collections of museums are family.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "collections of", specify the type of items being collected to provide clarity and context for the reader. For example, instead of saying 'collections of items', specify 'collections of stamps', 'collections of poems', or 'collections of data'.
Common error
Avoid repeating the phrase "collections of" too frequently within the same paragraph or passage. Vary your language by using synonyms such as "groups of", "assemblies of", or "assortments of" to enhance readability and prevent monotony.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "collections of" functions as a noun phrase modifier, indicating that what follows are various sets or assemblages. Ludwig AI shows that it's commonly used to describe organized or curated groups.
Frequent in
News & Media
37%
Encyclopedias
19%
Science
15%
Less common in
Wiki
2%
Formal & Business
1%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "collections of" is a versatile and frequently used expression for describing various groupings of items. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and appropriate for a wide range of contexts, from formal academic writing to informal news reports. The phrase functions as a noun phrase modifier, serving to categorize and describe assemblages, with a neutral register that suits diverse audiences. While "collections of" is generally appropriate, it's advisable to specify the type of items being collected for clarity and avoid overuse by varying language with synonyms like "groups of" or "assemblies of". Top authoritative sources are The New York Times, Encyclopedia Britannica and The Guardian.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
groups of
Emphasizes the act of grouping items together, differing slightly from the inherent organization implied by "collections of".
assemblies of
Suggests a more formal or structured gathering, contrasting with the potentially more casual nature of "collections of".
assortments of
Highlights the variety within the group, whereas "collections of" simply denotes a gathering.
accumulations of
Implies a gradual gathering over time, adding a temporal dimension not necessarily present in "collections of".
selections of
Focuses on the act of choosing items for the group, unlike the more general "collections of".
sets of
Indicates a defined or related grouping, which might not always be the case with "collections of".
hoards of
Suggests a large, often hidden or secret gathering, contrasting with the neutral tone of "collections of".
compilations of
Specifically refers to items brought together into a single work or resource, differing from general collections.
aggregates of
Implies a coming together of separate elements into a mass, a slightly more technical term than "collections of".
stockpiles of
Suggests a reserve or supply that has been accumulated, which might have less variety than collections of.
FAQs
How can I use "collections of" in a sentence?
You can use "collections of" to describe various assemblages. For example: "The library houses extensive "collections of rare books"", "The museum displays "collections of ancient artifacts"", or "She has "collections of vintage clothing"".
What are some alternatives to "collections of"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "groups of", "assemblies of", "assortments of", or "sets of".
Is it more formal to say "collections of" or "groups of"?
"Collections of" often carries a slightly more formal tone compared to "groups of", particularly when referring to curated or organized assemblages, such as in museums or libraries. However, the choice depends on the specific context and intended audience.
What is the difference between "collections of" and "accumulations of"?
"Collections of" typically implies a deliberate or organized gathering, while "accumulations of" suggests a gradual gathering, often without a specific plan. For instance, "collections of stamps" implies a purposeful assembly, whereas "accumulations of dust" describes an unintentional gathering.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested