Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(59)
Elkanich v. United States (collateral review).
Mackey v. United States (collateral review).
The Court suggests that allowing federal courts to recognize plain error on collateral review would obscure the differences between collateral review and appeal.
I have frequently dissented from this Court's progressive emasculation of collateral review of criminal convictions.
He then invoked state collateral review and lost in the lower courts.
The principle that collateral review is different from direct review resounds throughout our habeas jurisprudence.
In this case, the rule of Mullaney has been applied retroactively on collateral review.
1030, 1039, 22 L.Ed.2d 248 (1969) (Harlan, J., dissenting), the important distinction between direct review and collateral review.
(c) It is for the Court to determine what harmless-error standard applies on collateral review of Brecht's Doyle claim.
He argues that the Chapman harmless-error standard applies with equal force on collateral review of Doyle error.
1133, 20 L.Ed.2d 81968968) (per curiam ), we have yet squarely to address its applicability on collateral review.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com