Sentence examples for collaboration size from inspiring English sources

Focusing on the differences between scientific fields, we find that, while categories are characterized by different collaboration size distributions, the distributions of how many collaborations to which an author is able to participate is conserved across fields pointing to underlying attentional and temporal constraints.

We found that, while categories, thought as a proxy for the corresponding scientific community, are characterized by different collaboration size distributions, the distributions of how many collaborations an author belongs to appears to be much more similar (as displayed by smaller JSD distances between (P d)) than between (P s))).

To study the effect of collaboration size, we divided the publications into those with four or fewer authors and those with five or more.

In Figure 11 and Figure 12 in Appendix 1, we show the distribution of collaboration sizes for respectively the six sectoral R&D networks and the six co-authorship networks.

We show that different patterns of collaboration exist across the various scientific communities within arXiv at the individual and group level, in terms of distribution of collaboration sizes and in terms of how sparse locally collaborations grow into denser, larger co-authorship groups.

Moreover, we also found that, despite different organizational and cultural differences across categories, the individual capacity to participate in collaborations is similar - as displayed by the low values of average and median d for all categories -, while collaboration sizes themselves tend to be more varied.

These empirical features include the right-skewed distribution of collaboration sizes (Figure 3), the distribution of activities to engage in a collaboration (Figure 4) which are very stable across domains and over time, the pronounced community structure of the networks and the existence of a giant-connected component (Figure 7).

Victor Henning, Co-Founder and CEO of Mendeley says that prior to today's introduction of premium packages, the London-based startup had already "upgraded hundreds of researchers and labs" who had asked for more storage space or larger collaboration sizes.

A pathway collaboration of size 16 was identified with a MCR of 46% in this subtype.

Effect sizes, standardised mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for studies where there were sufficient data to calculate this using the Campbell Collaboration effect size calculator.

Effect sizes were calculated using the Campbell Collaboration online effect size calculator, 48 employing study frequencies, means, SD and correlation coefficients.