Sentence examples for cold scenarios from inspiring English sources

In line with the versatility in coping with the cold scenarios, EIB202 genome also has an arsenal of 34 shock proteins (GroEL, GroES, IbpAB, GrpE, etc).

Results of the choice task were markedly different between the cancer and the common cold scenarios (see Figure  1).

In this work, the results of the steady state thermomechanical analysis of the IFMIF bayonet target assembly under two different design loading scenarios (a "hot" scenario and a "cold" scenario) are briefly reported highlighting the relevant indications obtained with respect to the fulfillment of the design requirements.

In particular, the analyses have shown that in the hot scenario the temperatures reached in the target assembly are within the material acceptable limits while in the cold scenario transition below the ductile to brittle transition temperature (DBTT) cannot be excluded.

Participants were more satisfied with the effective but less environmentally friendly drug (Option 1) in the cancer scenario compared to the common cold scenario (see Table  6).

In the cancer scenario, the environmental policy requires doctors to prescribe the drug with the lowest environmental impact; in the common cold scenario, the policy is based on label information.

Participants more strongly supported a policy that regulates labelling of OTC drugs (common cold scenario) than a policy that requires doctors to prescribe drugs with the lowest environmental impact (cancer scenario; see Table  6 for means and standard deviations).

In contrast, in the common cold scenario, individuals were less satisfied with Option 1 (Version 1: M = 4.54, SD = 2.71; Version 2: M = 4.47, SD = 2.88; Version 3: M = 4.57, SD = 2.70).

In the common cold scenario, participants were supportive of a label describing the negative environmental impact of OTC drugs (Version 1: M = 7.21, SD = 2.53; Version 2: M = 7.37, SD = 2.53; Version 3: M = 7.17, SD = 2.61).

In both the cancer and the common cold scenario, participants were asked how satisfied they would be with Option 1, given this drug was the only drug available to them.

In contrast, in the common cold scenario, more participants opted out of treatment when both drugs had a negative environmental impact (Version 1, Fluvex vs. Getaway: χ (2) = 28.03, p <.001), or they chose the drug with the lowest environmental impact (Version 2, Fluvex vs. Hydramax: χ (2) = 21.28, p <.001; Version 3, Getaway vs. Hydramax: χ (2) = 13.63, p =.001).