I love the culture clash of seeing Côte de Buttertubs and Côte de Blubberhouses in print — in Tour terms, a "Côte" is a hill, whereas a "col" is a mountain pass.
Does description ( height, col-our of hair and eyes, clothing) help us here?
They are allowed to play in the local teams, which would not be the case if they didn't understand and speak English.Would you call that also "maddening about language"?Col.
All sides are trying to steal as much as they can from the areas they control: ivory, gold, diamonds and col-tan (a mineral used in the manufacture of mobile telephones).
Another ledger reveals the painter had been in Naples the year before, when he was paid 200 ducats for the "Madonna col Bambino" for a church in Puglia.Drawing in diplomats, merchants and bankers, Naples was once the capital of a kingdom and centre of an important trading area.
Perhaps the Philosopher deceives us with his authority?" (Ramus, Scholae dialecticae, in Scholae in liberales artes, col. 155).
The Philosopher himself had intentionally made his theories a little more abstruse than they needed to be in order to sift the wheat from the chaff among his disciples (Ramus, Scholae dialecticae, in Scholae in liberales artes, col. 68).
In the definition and discussion of the problem of knowledge, he refers to the 20th proposition of the Interpretation and determines reason as the simple, bodiless knowledge of the known (Orbeliani, vol. I, p. 166, col. 1 2).
Other important philosophical definitions for example the determination of real being (Orbeliani, vol. I, p. 574, col. 1), of production (Orbeliani, vol. II, p. 366, col. 2; p. 367, col. 1), of causality (Orbeliani, vol. I, p. 480, col. 1 2), of motion (Orbeliani, vol. I, p. 479, col. 2)—are taken from Petrizi's Proclus Commentary.
After all, the formal unity of the nature is compatible with division into numerically many instances; some other unity must be the basis for the assertion that humanity is not many natures or species (Fonseca, In Met. V, c. 28, q. 3, sect. 1 [Fonseca (1599), vol. 2, col. 959F]).
More generally, Fonseca (rightly) holds that exact similarity between two haecceities would entail that the two haecceities were numerically identical (Fonseca, In Met. V, c. 6, q. 5, sect. 2 [Fonseca (1599), vol. 2, col. 185B]).
