Sentence examples for col c from inspiring English sources

The function that manages the goal attraction evaluates the reduction of distance moving from cell Position in cell c where x = Row(Position), y = Col(Position), i = Row(c) and j = Col(c): G ( c ) = Path F x, y - Path F i, j 2. where ∀ c ∈ Cells, G(c) ∈ [-1, 1].

Considering a cell c with i = Row(c) and j = Col(c), Ob ( c ) = - Obs F i, j r ob.

Every cell has a row and a column index, which indicates its position in the grid: Row ( c i ), Col ( c i ) : Cell → N. Consequently, a cell is also identified by its row and column on the grid, with the following notation: E n vj,k = c: (c ∈ Env) ∧ (Row(c) = j) ∧ (Col(c) = k).

where i = Row(c), j = Col(c), DensFi,j is the value of density field in the cell c, δ high and δ low are the two density thresholds that regulate the activation of overlapping.

(B, C, E and F ) ChIP assays were performed with FAMAp:FAMA-MYC in fama (B and E ) and FAMAp RBR-MYC in Col (C and FAMAp RBR-MYC antinMyColntibody as in (Lau et al., 2014 ).

ChIP assays were performed with FAMAp:FAMA-MYC in fama (B ), FAMAp RBR-MYC in Col (C ), and FAMAp RBR-MYC in FAMALGK (FAMAp:FAMA LGK ;fama ) (D ) using an anti-MyColntibody as in (Lau et al., 2014 ).

However, individuals where both copies of NOR2 were from Col parent (C-B, C-H, and C-C) had a CR DNA methylation content similar to that of the Col parent, regardless of the origin of NOR4 (Fig. 4B).

The six biochemical markers used as predictor variables were Col2 3/4Clong; Col2C; Col II C-telopeptide; C-propeptide of type II collagen; aggrecan 846 epitope; and COMP.

The positive relationship between family income and overall services use is explained by economic disparities in receipt of care from personal sources alone (Table  4, col. C).

The odds ratio for 2004 compared to 1989 (0.34, p < .01) corresponds to an average marginal effect of −.10 (Table  4, col. C).

The odds for high school graduates are 1.79 times greater compared to the reference category (p < .01), while the odds for college graduates are 2.90 times greater (p < .01) (Table  4, col. C).