Sentence examples for coherent drawings from inspiring English sources

The program would generate coherent drawings, based on the sketches, that one could then take to a builder or architect (the Web site will include a network of suggested ones).

Analyzing only the explicitly coherent line drawings, 90.6% (±10.47%) belonged to the objective class of fragmented stimuli, and among these explicitly coherent and fragmented drawings, participants could, outside the MEG, give the correct name or a synonym in 93.08% (±9.09%) of the cases.

Further supporting evidence for the OFC's involvement in the representation and top-down processing of gist or meaning has been reported by Luu and colleagues (2010), who used a WGCT-like task with electroencephalography and found that reentrant OFC activation was linked to the judgment of fragmented line drawings as coherent.

The masked stimuli (line-drawings of coherent, familiar objects and scrambled, meaningless non-objects) were presented below, near, and above the subjective perceptual threshold.

Draw several gesture drawings.

For example, BIM enables architects and the rest of the design and construction team to work collaboratively using one coherent system rather than as separate sets of drawings, consequently saving time and money.

In total, participants rated 52.66% (±12.00 percentage points [pp]) of all line drawings (i.e., fragmented as well as scrambled ones) as coherent and claimed to be able to name 27.12% (±10.34 pp) of them.

Participants were told in the instructions that they would be shown the line drawings they claimed to be able to name (i.e., the explicitly coherent line drawings) again after the experimental session (i.e., outside the MEG).

Note, however, that also the few scrambled line drawings (i.e., those without an objectively correct solution) that were judged as coherent and nameable (median number over participants = 5) were included in the analysis as explicitly coherent stimuli.

Studies applying WGCT-like paradigms (Bolte & Goschke, 2008; Bowers et al., 1990; Luu et al., 2010; Topolinski & Strack, 2009; Volz & von Cramon, 2006) have revealed that participants discriminate between fragmented and scrambled line drawings over chance; that is, they are significantly more likely to rate fragmented than scrambled line drawings as coherent.

Coherent juxtapositions of the 30 examples demonstrate how de Kooning's process might sometimes involve tracings on vellum, references to small drawings or, in the 1980's, projecting the small drawings onto a large, new canvas.