The EEG coherence networks of pre-ictal patients, generally, did not differ from those of HCs, except for a slight increase in posterior beta EEG coherence (Fig. 4b).
In addition, Dorflein [52] stated and proved that the basic theorem on coherence networks of concept lattices as an extension of the basic theorem on concept lattices.
Meanwhile, ictal patients had significantly lower EEG coherence networks in the delta, theta, and beta bands than did pre-ictal patients (FDR-adjusted p <.05; Fig. 5b).
Finally, compared to post-ictal patients, inter-ictal patients had markedly lower EEG coherence networks in the alpha band (FDR-adjusted p <.05; Fig. 5d).
Large significant differences in EEG coherence networks were observed in the delta, theta, and alpha bands in the frontal, central, temporal, parietal, and occipital regions.
Delta, theta, alpha, and beta EEG coherence networks were lower in inter-ictal patients than in HCs (FDR-adjusted p <.05; Fig. 4a), with the exception of fronto-occipital network.
The cortical connection intensities of EEG coherence networks for theta and alpha frequency bands in ictal patients were lower than those in HCs (FDR-adjusted p <.05; Fig. 4c).
Observational learning was found to be supported by a pair of fronto-parietal coherence networks, one overlaying the left and one overlaying the right hemisphere.
Future research might examine the coherence of network actions and the network-centric view in greater detail.
Additionally, shunting rather than hyperpolarizing EGABA has been shown to increase the frequency and reduce coherence of network oscillations.
