Sentence examples for cognitive statements from inspiring English sources

This confrontation was implicit in the development of the Peircian "verifiability" theory toward its exclusion of metaphysical statements as cognitive statements capable of possessing any truth value whatsoever.

This is, according to the authors, not a form of discrimination: "Notice that we are not saying that the way this community builds knowledge, the knowledge built, or the criteria employed to appraise cognitive statements are epistemically superior to any other body of approaches, ideas, statements, criteria.

The ground for the emotivist position, in their view, was the logical positivist thesis that there could be only two kinds of cognitive statements, a position that was buttressed by what were later referred to as "the two dogmas" of empiricism.

At this point therefore, one would wish to maintain that "God is radically transcendent" remains a cognitive statement.

Postponing discussion of its precise logical status for Leibowitz, and provisionally accepting that "God is radically transcendent" is a cognitive statement, a rough first formulation of its meaning would be that God is an existent entity that is absolutely incomparable to any other form of reality that we can possibly encounter.

A prediction is a statement of a case within a relational matrix; it is a cognitive statement, and as such it takes place within a descriptive domain.

Significantly, Maturana and Varela identified predictive mechanisms in play early on for autopoiesis: A prediction is a statement of a case within a relational matrix; it is a cognitive statement, and as such it takes place within a descriptive domain.

This section shows experimental results of cognitive, emotional, behavioral statement changes based on sensory information.

Statements that could not meet the criteria of analyticity or verifiability were non-cognitive, that is, statements which could not admit their predication as being either true or false.

Participants indicated the extent to which they endorsed each cognitive or affective statement on a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).

Accordingly, empirical statements were cognitive and could be shown in principle to be either true or false.