Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
In conclusion, SMR NF specifically affects cognitive functions (cognitive specificity) and tonic EEG (baseline specificity), while increasing SMR during NF training nonspecifically affects slower EEG frequencies as well (band non-specificity).
Our present study thus focused on the specificity of NF on three levels: band specificity, cognitive specificity, and baseline specificity.
However the significant correlations suggest that increases in goal specificity may in part reflect a broader increase in cognitive specificity in people receiving MBCT.
Similar(57)
These include the cognitive content-specificity model [ 9] and the tripartite model [ 10].
These findings were generally inconsistent with the cognitive content-specificity hypothesis.
Many studies have investigated aspects of the cognitive content-specificity model and the tripartite model [ 11, 20- 24].
The cognitive content-specificity model postulates that depressed individuals and anxious individuals differ in their maladaptive thought content.
Findings of this investigation give support for models like the cognitive content-specificity model and the tripartite model and could provide useful handles for treatment focus.
The findings of this investigation give support for models like the cognitive content-specificity model and the tripartite model and could provide useful handles for treatment focus.
Our findings are in line with previous research, [ 13, 21, 25, 28, 29] and seem to fit in models like the cognitive content-specificity model and the tripartite model of anxiety and depression.
Previous research showed that the constructs of the cognitive content-specificity model and the tripartite model are meaningfully correlated, and that the integration of the models may better discriminate between anxiety (high negative affect and anxiety cognitions) and depression (high negative affect, low positive affect, and depression cognitions) than either model alone [ 25- 27].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com