Sentence examples for cognitive species from inspiring English sources
Holkot's opponent was not Ockham, here, however, but his Dominican contemporary William Crathorn, who had argued for the view that natural and cognitive species were the same in kind.
Stereotyping, or categorizing, has evolved to our support our cognitive-limited species in a highly unpredictable world.
Conceptually, the comparison of cognitive abilities across species is a delicate topic, since cognitive abilities may be functionally related though mechanistically distinctive in different species, particularly if their brains anatomies have diverged.
However, no study has assessed the relationship between sleep and the brain structures that are implicated in specific cognitive processes across species.
The presence of advanced cognitive functions in species distinguished for their sophisticated tool-oriented behaviour should still be considered as a working hypothesis [1].
For instance, it may fail to properly measure the cognitive abilities of species that do not self-groom or rely heavily on senses other than vision [15].
Some studies cast doubt on Lévy walks as an optimal strategy existing in animals, however, first because of methodological shortcomings in the estimation of power-law exponents but also because of the impact of resource distribution and the probability of species' cognitive abilities being sufficient to find this strategy [3], [13] [15].
Lately, comparative analyses have used an indirect approach to investigate the association between brain size and cognitive ability across species.
A new stance for future comparative research may be to establish behavioral and psychological profiles prior or alongside to comparing specific cognitive skills across species.
Once species typical cognitive normal ranges are established, cognitive comparisons can be made between parrot species and between parrots and other taxa.
This paper explores the link between social complexity, spatial distribution and cognition during the Late Pleistocene, suggesting a mechanism whereby cognitive differences between hominid species may have arisen.
