Sentence examples for coercive law from inspiring English sources

The mob craving to bring coercive law into every realm of human behaviour has long troubled ethicists.

The standard view tells us that religious reasons are never sufficient to justify coercive law.

Since there is a presumption against coercive law, the PJP, when satisfied, overcomes the presumption.

First, Rawls' own position about the relation between coercive law and religious reasons has shifted.

However, if a coercive law can be morally legitimate even though some citizens are not in a strong position to recognize that it is, then (in principle) a coercive law can be justified even if it requires a religious rationale.

The DRR is a negative constraint; it identifies a kind of reason that cannot itself justify a coercive law and so a kind of reason on which citizens may not exclusively rely when supporting a coercive law.

But gendercide cannot be reduced just by coercive laws.

Interpersonal relationships are replaced by coercive laws and commercial contracts, as Polanyi was first to recognise.

Accordingly, religious believers should exercise restraint when deliberating about the implementation of coercive laws.

Jonathan Quong holds that public justification concerns the imposition of coercive laws (Quong 2011, 233 250).

According to advocates of the standard view, citizens should not support coercive laws for which they believe there is no plausible secular rationale, although they may support coercive laws for which they believe there is only a secular rationale.