Sentence examples for coercion required from inspiring English sources

Interference with liberty of action, especially by the use of power or coercion, required a special sort of justification: that it was needed to prevent harm to others.

When the diversity of citizens' reasons is brought to bear on the process of public justification, it may turn out that very few proposals can be publicly justified, so few that intuitively legitimate political orders could not permissibly engage in the forms of coercion required to maintain even a society's basic structure.

The U.N. Committee Against Torture urged Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe — who has also questioned the level of coercion required — to condemn Hashimoto's comments.

Along with circumstances related to the petitioner, of course, the determination of coercion requires examination of the conduct of the police and the environment in which interrogation and confession occurred.

Coercion requires a justification, which might include compensation to the coerced, but need not in all cases.

If so, then even on a moralized account we may suppose that government coercion requires special justification before it can be accepted.

Of course, if identifying coercion requires a prior moral judgment, then one will need to be able to make such judgments reliably in order to be able to identify coercion reliably.

If recent reflection on the issue is any guide, the most pressing problem to address is this: Given that state-authorized coercion needs to be justified, and that the justification of state coercion requires the consent of the people, what role may religious reasons play in justifying state coercion?

So unless the coercer or coercee is irrational (and the other perceives him as such), or unless one is deceived about the other's relative power (or rationality), coercion requires some significant differential in power between coercer and coercee for it, in general, to be a rational, useful technique.

Additionally, absent physical restraint, coercion requires "serious harm," defined as any harm that is "sufficiently serious... to compel a reasonable person of the same background and in the same circumstances" to continue to perform the required labor or sexual activity.

The point at which fine tuning request procedures might be considered coercion requires further discussion and clarification.