Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(19)
In any case, the word "coercion" is not apt — at least not the way you use it.
But of course coercion is not the test of establishment of religion: paying for a church service would not cease to be an illegitimate use of government funds even if the worship was noncoercive and involved no outreach.
It is to acknowledge the imperfect nature of our own socio-economic and political arrangements, in which missile silos have long co-existed invisibly with mailboxes, and the writer, however free of external coercion, is not always ready or willing to interrogate his own relationship with power.
Yet coercion is not a viable means for getting these countries to get on the development path.
However, one can imagine a similar situation in which the agent of "coercion" is not another person.
It says that "in the cases of vulnerable adults who lack the capacity to consent to marriage, coercion is not required for a marriage to be forced".
Similar(41)
Coercion was not beyond the pale.
Controlling girls through beatings or threats was common, but coercion was not an effective basis for a lasting relationship, most pimps emphasized.
Yes, and the horrendous press since September 2010, including 4 major lawsuits alleging sexual coercion were not in any way a factor?
In contrast, torture and other forms of forced coercion are not only illegal, morally repugnant, and harmful to any country's image, they also are ineffective.
Anyone who has lived for any extended period of time under oppression knows that the strongest tools of coercion are not physical, but mental.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com