"coercion into" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to describe someone being forced or pressured to do something against their will. Example: The union criticized the company for its use of coercion into working overtime without proper compensation.
There are so many ways in which this leaves vulnerable families exposed to pressure, or coercion into accepting feeble settlements, it doesn't bear thinking about.
Reports have surfaced of spurious medicines, unclean surgical instruments, women not being examined before the operation, and even of coercion into the camp.
Based on previous debates, the paper argues that unpacking coercion into its different types is important in acknowledging the role of the bureaucrat within the study of (urban) security.
In December, at a fund-raising dinner at a hotel in Washington, D.C., twelve hundred people watched a video that told tales of girls' coercion into sexual slavery, followed by accounts of their liberation and redemption.
You face stark choices: ostracism, sham marriages, or worst of all, coercion into leadership – condemned to a lifetime in religious attire that doesn't even cinch at the waist let alone follow seasonal trends.
Since it was set up in 2004, the scheme has helped 113 students, including some who have been in local authority care, resisted coercion into arranged marriage, and battled with severe physical disabilities.
In 1996, Nurius and Norris [ 44] "offer[ed] a theoretical model that consolidates background, environmental, and intrapersonal variables related to women's experience of sexual coercion in dating into a coherent ecological framework and present[ed] for the first time a cognitive analysis of the processes women use to formulate responses to sexual coercion" (p. 117).
"With less than three coercive controls on average per police authority, more needs to be done so that people can involve the police at an early stage before coercion turns into physical abuse".
Because cultural and religious communities raise and educate children, they cannot be seen as purely voluntary opt-outs from the liberal state: they exercise coercive power over children, and so basic liberal principles about protecting the innocent from unjustified coercion come into play.
Habermas (2005b, 89) identifies four such presuppositions as the most important: (i) no one capable of making a relevant contribution has been excluded, (ii) participants have equal voice, (iii) they are internally free to speak their honest opinion without deception or self-deception, and (iv) there are no sources of coercion built into the process and procedures of discourse.
Coercion beats them into conformity whereas persuasion seduces them into it.
