Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(5)
Significant differences were found between at least some kittens in all three litters (Friedman tests: Fr = 16.3, 25.8, 11.3; P < 0.0001, 0.0001, 0.0085, respectively), and there was significant agreement on kitten ranks among the six observers (Kendall coefficients of concordance: W = 0.84, 0.84, 0.55; P < 0.01 for the three litters, respectively).
Kendall's Coefficients of Concordance W were 0.258, 0.239, 0.231, and 0.197 for the variants 1, 2, 3, and pooled data, respectively (all p<0.001).
Kappa coefficients of concordance were used to evaluate the agreement between the two readers.
The results presented coefficients of concordance supported with confidence intervals (95% confidence level) calculated using bootstrap analysis of the samples (100 order changes).
Kendall's coefficients of concordance (W) were highest (0.34, P < 0.001) for hazard scores given by mixed-background experts, which is explained by the fact that these were experts that had been involved as authors of the EFSA report [ 9].
Similar(55)
Kendall's coefficient of concordance.
The computed Kendall's coefficient of concordance was W=0.24 (p<0.05).
The Coefficient of concordance W was tested for significance using the F distribution.
The Kendall's coefficient of concordance was significant at W = 0.14.
The Kendall's coefficient of concordance on this scenario was W=0.19 (p<0.05).
The consistency of the rankings was also significant since the computed Kendall's coefficient of concordance was W=0.17.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com