Sentence examples for coefficients is given in table from inspiring English sources

The comparison of experimental and simulated alpha coefficients is given in Table 3. Table 3 Comparison of the alpha coefficients between the experiments and the simulations after calibration   α Experimental (Ω·W−1) α Simulated (Ω·W−1) Difference W10 1.115 1.048 5.98 W30.19999 0.180 9.33 W50.0929 0.092.5757.

Two examples of such plots are shown in Figure 4 (individual correlation plots can also be seen in Supplementary Figs 4– 8); a graphical summary of changes in these correlations over time is displayed in Figure 5 (the complete set of correlation coefficients is given in Table 3).

The values of approximated coefficients are given in Table 1.

The A and B coefficients are given in Table 1.

The values of correlation coefficients are given in Table 3.

The coefficients are given in Table 5 below, with associated standard errors in the parenthesis.

The values of the a ij and b ij coefficients are given in Table 6.

The original DCT matrix was obtained when the floating-point constants are converted to integers using a quantization value of 8. Its coefficients are given in Table 3.

The data were subjected to statistical analysis using a linear regression model; the regression equations and correlation coefficients are given in Table 3.

Figure 7 depicts range-dependent path loss for tenuous, thick, and extra thick atmosphere conditions whose coefficients are given in Table 1.

For the base fluid and all the studied nanofluids, the standard deviations obtained with this correlation are lower than or equal to 1.4 × 10−4 cm3 g−1, and the coefficients are given in Table 3.