Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(1)
Since the backscattering coefficient of reference silica nanospheres was calculated by the Mie theory as μ b s r e f = 0.695 mm -1, we were able to deduce the backscattering coefficient of test silica nanospheres to be μ b s t e s t = 0.667 mm -1 (from Eq. (5)).
Similar(59)
The amplification of the total uplink path is G meas = G ZX60 + G ZVA183+ + G BP1 + G BP2 + G sc (1) Figure 4 Logarithmic transmission and reflection coefficients of reference coil and bandpass filters.
(3)Here μ b s r e f (μ e x t r e f ) and μ b s t e s t (μ e x t t e s t ) are the backscattering (and extinction) coefficients of reference and test phantoms, respectively; h r e f (z ) and h t e s t (z ) are the geometric factor functions in the reference and test phantom, respectively.
Figure 3 Frequency scalogram of wavelet coefficient of the reference gear unit.
Figure 4 Frequency scalogram of square wavelet coefficient of the reference gear unit.
After the calibrations, the probe was able to measure the scattering coefficient of the reference liquid samples with the relative errors between 3%21%%, whereas higher measurement errors were obtained for the absorption coefficient due to low absolute absorption values for the samples.
We first, determined the average correlation coefficient of the reference sample signal between all pairs of hybridizations within PT or PP experiments.
Recalibrating both the macroinvertebrate and diatom indices to reference thresholds based on nutrient concentrations resulted in lower coefficient of variation among reference sites, greater differentiation between reference and non-reference and stronger relationship with stressors than when reference thresholds were based on landscape disturbance.
The low tAs concentration urine sample at SRM 2669 level 1 had a reference value of 9.22 ± 0.32 ng As/mL, and the reference value was 43.67 ± 0.63 ng As/mL for the high tAs concentration at SRM 2669 level 2. Replicate analyses of SRM 2669 showed values with < 10% coefficient of variation of reference values for the high and low standards.
This can be seen in Figure 4 with the plotted reflection coefficients of the reference coil.
The Kullback-Leibler distance (KLD) between the probability distribution of the wavelet coefficients of the reference and distorted images is used as a distortion measure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com