Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The coefficient of prevalence of TB by the smear microscopy was 289,3/100,000 and by the culture was 1,079.7/100,000 [ 32].
Similar(59)
A linear trend was calculated using Pearson correlation coefficient for prevalence ratios of children aged 0 12 months and older than 12 months requiring PC in the respective years of the study.
The linear regression coefficients of retinopathy prevalence by the FPG 1% increment approach were 0.8 (P = 0.476) and 3.9 (P < 0.001) for before and after the change point of 5.8 mmol/l, respectively.
The linear regression coefficients of retinopathy prevalence by the 1% increment approach were 0.7 (P = 0.756) and 12.7 (P < 0.001) for before and after the change point of 5.5%, respectively.
OR: Odds Ratio by exposure unit 95%CI: 95% Confidence Intervals p: p-value of a test of a zero coefficient P: Prevalence of pleural plaques.
OR: Odds Ratio by exposure unit 95%CI: 95% Confidence Intervals p: p-value of a test of a zero coefficient P: Prevalence of asbestosis TSFE: Time Since First Exposure.
The relationship between perceived and measured frailty was assessed using percent agreement, kappa statistic, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and prevalence of misclassification of frailty.
Briefly, we assumed: a coefficient of variation of 0.2; prevalence of ICD-10 common mental disorders of 66% among participants who screened positive; follow-up of 75% at 6 months.
The urgency criterion is delta, the coefficient of linear trend of the prevalence of the risk factor between 2006 and 2011.
Wang and Lee [ 87] showed that if a population stratification exists, then case-only studies may be biased, and the bias involves the coefficient of variation of the exposure prevalence odds, the coefficient of variation of the genotype frequency odds, and the correlation coefficient between the exposure prevalence odds and the genotype frequency odds.
The sampling formula provided by Bennet et al. [ 27] resulted in a total of 520 animals to be tested for BTB assuming an intraclass correlation coefficient of rho 0.2, an expected prevalence of 5% and a standard error of 2.8% [ 27].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com