Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
The regression coefficient of gender shows a negative sign (−0.549), indicating the probability to start up is greater for men.
Moreover, the coefficient of gender was significant at 5%levels, and negatively related to the amount of credit repaid.
The result shows that the main effect coefficient of gender is −0.25 and has no statistical significance.
The coefficient of gender (GNR) of household head is statistically significant in the pooled data, among the sub-population of the upland and lowland rice farming households.
The coefficient of gender is negative and significant in the sorghum, rice and yam regressions but not statistically significant for other crops, implying that male headed homes gain higher yields from the cultivation of these crops but there is no statistical significant difference in yields of other food crop between male and female farmers.
Let β1 be the coefficient of gender in this model.
Similar(53)
The coefficients of gender in the three utility functions are 0.5972, 0.5136, and 0.3566.
The coefficient of the gender dummy in regression I captures the average gross gender employment gap that we saw in the earlier figures, and the time trend interacted with the gender dummy reflects the closing gender gap pattern.
This means, for example, the regression coefficient on gender indicates the effect of a student being female (versus being a male) on the probability the student reports feeling there was enough time in class, assuming all other variables are equal.
Nevertheless, when excluding the youngest and the oldest age-groups (column 2), the coefficient of the gender variable becomes smaller and insignificant, suggesting that these two particular age groups had a strong influence on the result.
The coefficient for gender of household head is negative and significant at 5%% suggesting that the probability of adopting at least one improved pigeonpea variety diminishes with being a male farmer.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com