Though the coefficients differ at different quantiles in quantile regression, the results are still consistent with previous work which implies the non-liner relationship between control variables and innovation.
This coefficient differs from the pure material creep coefficient provided in the standards.
However, the value of friction coefficient differs greatly from each other.
However, the Li storage behaviour as well as the chemical diffusion coefficient differed.
In contrast to the results from single-order-parameter theories, the orientation dependence of the kinetic coefficient differs significantly from that of the surface energy.
In three microcosms (#29, #33 and #36), the sign of the selection coefficient differed between low or high initial frequencies.
An ANCOVA showed that the pitching moment coefficient differed between model configurations and increased with leg angle, and the incremental change in pitch moment coefficient with leg angle also differed between model configurations (configuration: F3,44 = 218.75, p<0.001; leg angle: F1,44 = 111.93, p<0.001; configuration*leg angle: F3,44 = 12.23, p<0.001).
In the same exercise, the mean value of the ISBAM symmetry coefficient differed significantly in relation to the resting values (P < 0.001).
No significant changes in Gini coefficient were seen between longitudinal samples of HC (P = 0.687) or SLE (P = 0.843) subjects (Fig. 3c), although Gini coefficient differed significantly between the two groups (Fig. 1b).
Trend tests for each physical activity variable were performed by fitting the median value of exposure categories in the statistical models and determining whether the estimated slope coefficient differed from zero (Wald test).
