Sentence examples for cocaine guidelines from inspiring English sources

The commission has also released a study of what happened to inmates who won early release after 2007, when it made retroactive a related set of changes to its crack cocaine guidelines.

But Julie Stewart, the president of Families Against Mandatory Minimums, a group that advocates for judicial discretion in sentencing decisions, contended that the commission should make its crack cocaine guidelines retroactive without any exceptions because criminal histories and any gun possession were already factored into sentences under a separate part of the guidelines.

While Congress has rarely used its supervisory power since the Commission's creation in 1987, it has done so in the past, most notably in 1995, when it rejected the Commission's proposed change to the "crack cocaine" guidelines.

The panel, which advises federal judges on how much prison time they should hand down for particular offenses, revised its crack cocaine sentencing guidelines last fall in response to the 2010 law.

One day, in her criminal law class, while discussing the differences in sentencing guidelines for cocaine- and crack-related offenses.

The act imposed more severe penalties for selling crack than it did for powder cocaine, which set sentencing guidelines that were racially discriminatory.

Sentencing guidelines for powdered cocaine, by comparison, call for five years in prison for selling 500 grams of that drug.

Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, the committee's ranking Republican, has introduced legislation that would eliminate the commission's plan to make the new guidelines for crack cocaine sentences retroactive.

Obama supported the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 and the 2011 retroactive changes to the federal sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine, which have helped stem the growth of America's prison population.

A former federal prosecutor, he played a role in striking down the mandatory 100-to-1 100-to-1 100-to-1ck and powderatioaine in the federal sentencing guidelines betweening the crackof Speand v. United States in the U.S. Supowdercocainewinh the Court ruling that judges could categorically reject that ratio.

At issue is a ruling by the United States Sentencing Commission that, beginning March 3, defendants convicted of crack cocaine offenses be sentenced under new guidelines with lesser penalties.