Sentence examples for coarse assessment from inspiring English sources

It should be considered by conservation planners as a rapid and coarse assessment of potential costs in achieving a particular conservation goal [21].

However, this QST-FST comparison is not to be considered a precise test for natural selection, but rather as a coarse assessment to explore if some traits and deme comparisons show consistent patterns of differences in the two metrics.

Hence, data about the occurrence and frequency of potential hybridisation partners of oilseed rape were collected within BINATS to allow for a coarse regional assessment of the risks involved in releasing a GM crop with that high potential for hybridisation and long viability of seeds.

CES and their associated uses demonstrated complex relationships that should be explored in further research, though the study indicates that recreation as an indicator is too coarse for assessments at this level.

This is a coarse-scale assessment because time points were taken every two minutes starting at ten minutes after eclipse of the phage into the host cell.

Large-scale landscape planning to maintain biodiversity usually integrates coarse-scale assessments of land use change with systematic evaluations of its effects on the likelihood of species becoming extinct years in the future, or their population viability.

Empirical coarse-scale assessments of this question across large regions, or even globally, tend to answer "yes", while fine-scale studies of individual protected areas often and repeatedly answer "no".

There was also a significantly greater incidence of patients achieving improvement in lentigines, elastosis, pore size, coarse wrinkling, overall assessment of photodamage and global improvement in the tazarotene group.

Borgert et al. (2012) recently showed that the underlying assumptions and analysis in support of this "common adverse outcomes" recommendation of the NRC (2008b) are useful only primarily as a coarse screening level assessment, and that refined approaches are needed once one considers larger numbers of chemicals.

Although clinically useful, this kind of qualitative assessment is coarse, subjective, and has large inter- and intrareader variability [ 23], which makes it difficult to standardize.

However, exposure assessment for coarse particles is more challenging than for PM2.5 because of the influence of local sources, hence central site monitors are likely to have greater errors in representing residential concentrations.