Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Given the apparent correlation between a major change of gene expression and acquisition of TRAIL sensitivity after 8 h exposure to CMS, we used DREM to identify the TF s) responsible for the gene program(s) initiated at 8 h.
Similar(59)
To gain an overview of changes in chromatin in response to the knockdown of a CM, we used ATAC-seq56,57 ATAC-seq56,57chromaton accessibility after knockdown.
To identify genetic polymorphisms specifically associated to CM, we used the strategy of comparing genotype frequencies between 130 patients with the CM syndrome and 158 patients with severe forms of malaria severe malaria in absence of CM (SnC).
For each bed position (16.2 cm, overlapping scale: 4.2 cm) we used 4 min.
For each bed position (16.2 cm, overlapping scale 4.2 cm) we used 4-min acquisition time with a 15.5-cm field of view (FOV).
For tumors more than 5 cm in diameter, we usually chose microwave ablation for HCC treatment; for tumors less than or equal to 5 cm, we used RFA.
To calculate the physical distance per cM, we used the physical distance in soybean relative to the genetic distance in common bean.
In an attempt to characterize the molecules released by muscle cells present in the conditioned media (CM), we used a protein array that was able to detect several cytokines and chemokines (Additional file 1: Figure S1).
For a 12-well plate (4 cm), we used 2 μl of transfection reagent, 2 μl of 20 μM siRNA solution, and 30 000 ES cells in 1 ml of N2B27 medium.
For one well of a 6-well plate (10 cm), we used 6 μl of transfection reagent, 2 μg of plasmid DNA, and 300 000 cells in 2 ml of N2B27 medium.
If the distance from the stricture to the sphincter of Oddi was at least 2 cm, we used a "conventional stent" (across the sphincter of Oddi) or an "inside stent" (above the sphincter of Oddi), and if the distance from the stricture to the sphincter of Oddi was less than 2 cm, we selected a conventional stent.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com