Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(25)
As evidenced by the difference between long-term efficacy (53% CM vs 100% ON) and system removal rates (7 patients with CM vs 0 with ON) in our series, correct diagnosis is essential for scientific and economic evaluation of ONS.
Pain was significantly lower for indwelling catheter injections when scored by parents (median, 1.2 cm vs 2.7 cm; P =.002), children/teenagers (0.8 cm vs 1.5 cm; P =.006), and nurses (1.4 cm vs 3.0 cm; P =.002).
Parental pre-injection anxiety was also lower (1.2 cm vs 2.9 cm; P =.016).
The following measured distances were smaller in African American women: ischial spine to inferior sacral angle (5.4 cm vs 5.9 cm, P =.016) and bi-ischial diameter (10.0 cm vs 10.6 cm, P =.004).
Taking injections, including inserting catheters, was found to be less problematic with an indwelling catheter (1.6 cm vs 3.3 cm P =.009).
F = 5.29 0.006 CM vs MWA – MA p < 0.01 F = 6.13 0.003 CM vs MA and MWA p < 0.05 PedMIDAS Pediatric Migraine Disability Scale According to the headache diagnosis (class).
Similar(35)
The Nafion® solution can occupy 98.2% (4.91 cm vs. 5 cm) of the end-sealed capillary when the Pinner is lowered to 5 × 102 Pa.
The first type we refer to as global alterations was observed in the prints of both the fore- and hindpaws (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5) and consisted of shortening of stride lengths (FP: 14.97 cm vs. 9.50 cm, p<0.01; HP: 12.52 cm vs. 9.66 cm, p<0.01) and an increase of track widths (Figs. 4B, 4D and 5B,5D) (FP: 2.37 cm vs. 3.25 cm, p<0.01; HP: 4.94 cm vs. 6.33 cm, p<0.01).
We observed vesicle-like structures in the 100K pellet and their amount was clearly higher after stimulation with VMR-CM vs CSML0-CM (Fig. 2E).
The treatment factors were (1) source of supplemental protein (CM vs. W-DDGS) and (2) dietary CP content (15 vs. 17%; DM basis).
Very similar to L. lucidum, which has larger leaves (6-15 cm vs. <6 cm long for L. japonicum).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com