Regarding beliefs, all three clusters were significantly different.
The three clusters were significantly different regarding some variables related to the adoption process.
The SUV averages of the clusters were significantly different on account of significant differences between the higher average SUV of C1 samples versus the average SUV of the remaining clusters (i.e., C1 vs C2, C1 vs C3, C1 vs C4, and C1 vs C5, p < 0.05 for all comparisons by the Student t test).
Results showed that the two clusters were significantly associated with prognosis (p = 0.045, Kaplan-Meier) (Figure 1 C, D).
Cav1.2 clusters were significantly (P<0.001) larger with β2d (by ∼20%) and β3 present (by ∼30%) (Figure 1B).
The conservative approach (using the "conjunction" option in SPM8) ensured that all identified clusters were significantly different from both control conditions.
Statistical analysis showed that D in subtrajectories of single QDs around Homer1c- and gephyrin-positive clusters were significantly different from each other and from extrasynaptic QDs (Kolmogorov-Smirnoff; pGABAergic/glutamatergic = 0.022, pglutamatergic/extrasynaptic<10−3, pGABAergic/extrasynaptic = 0.007).
Similarly, work done by Prange et al., 2001 found using timelapse imaging of cultured cortical neurons that filopodia containing PSD-95 clusters were significantly more stable than those lacking clusters and led to an increase in the number of synapses formed [58].
The substance use and problem behaviours clusters were significantly associated with depressive symptoms (Table 3).
However school clusters were significantly different on six out of nine indications.
Affective, cognitive, and somatic clusters were significantly higher in the internship period.
