Exact(3)
Overlapping regions of the predicted clusters from the three programs, composed of Gln482-Thr484, Ser527-Pro540, Ser527-Pro540, Tyr559-Asn560, Asn562-Gln568, Asn573 and Ser582-Thr586, were considered parts of the 8H3 epitope.
Automated clustering of these proteomes predicted 1,951 (S-D), 1,946 (S-A) and 3,202 (D-A) orthologous protein clusters from the three possible pairwise combinations.
Spectral clustering was used to create protein clusters from the three anaerobic sulfur-reducing heterotrophs, and the clusters shared by all three or by pairs of the three were derived and [see Additional file 1].
Similar(57)
One interesting question one may ask is "how similar (or different) are clusters from the five different similarity measures in the aggregate?" However, this is not an easy question to answer, considering that clustering of more than 800 thousand compounds resulted in a total of 18 million clusters.
To further confirm the existence of the clusters from the two cDNA libraries, 34 clusters from the apical cell cDNA library and 37 clusters from the basal cell cDNA library were selected for RT-PCR.
Notably, initially only the HR clusters from the two datasets showed a significant association, and only after their removal could we identify the significant association for the OxPhos and BCR subtypes [7].
Fig. 2 shows the pairwise signal pattern between transcript clusters from the two arrays.
In the α2β2 assembly, the two distal [4Fe 4S] clusters from the two β-subunits (small subunits) lie in close proximity, less than 15 Å apart.
Supplement Tables S1 and S2 in 'Additional file 1' list the 54 (= 43 + (2 × 6) - 1) miRNA clusters from the two studies with the associated information.
The distribution of signals for these 5507 transcript clusters from the two array types for the breast tissue samples are shown in Fig. 1.
The result shows three consensus clusters (cluster A, 76 samples mostly COPD; cluster I, 80 samples mostly ILD; cluster E, 43 samples of intermediate subtype) and six off-diagonal differentially defined clusters from the two omics data sources.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com