Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Close categorization was noted for MIP-1β (predicted to be medium instead of moderately high), IL-6 (moderately low instead of medium), IL-17 (moderately low instead of low) and MIP-1α (moderately high instead of high) (Table 3 and Fig. 7).
Similar(59)
By turns absorbing, confounding, exhausting and altogether stranger and more rib-ticklingly funny than most fiction, Craig Baldwin's infelicitously titled and cacophonous provocation, "Mock Up on Mu," comes close to defying categorization.
The tree associated with auditory markers showed that the multiple interval tasks (discrimination and multiple interval tapping) formed an individual branch, with the categorization closer to them in an individual branch, followed by the single interval tapping in another, more distant one (Fig. 3B).
Performance was also close values obtained when categorization is done in the far peripheral visual field [27] where the influence of the magnocellular pathway is dominant.
Functional categorization based on closest hit on Arabidopsis chromosome, and the annotation of corresponding genes.
A congruency index closer to 1 indicates that subjects maintained the same categorization, while a congruency index closer to 0 indicates that subjects changed the categorization.
Her close friend Nosheen Ali wrote, "Sabeen defied categorization.
Average AUC results of close to 90% are shown for categorization of 6 different pathologies in a dataset of more than 600 radiographs.
But this 1940 animated feature from Walt Disney remains unassailable, a cultural artifact that stands beyond simple categorization, perhaps Hollywood's closest brush with the avant-garde.
For example, for auditory markers, the multiple interval tasks (multiple interval tapping, discrimination) are close together forming a branch, whereas the categorization task is the next closest to them, followed by the single interval tapping in another branch.
In all cases, MinRT computed for the superordinate task appears very close to MinRT at the basic level of categorization in the Dog0%A condition (309 ms or 260 ms compared to 306 ms or 250 ms).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com