Sentence examples for clonal exclusion from inspiring English sources

A consequence of the high prevalence of InsGs in spermatozoa, combined with the strict criteria for clonal exclusion, is that the frequency of InsGs in spermatozoa-after clonal exclusion -did not appear significantly different from the liver (hypergeometric test).

The differences in InsG frequencies are not apparent after clonal exclusion since the frequency is greatly influenced by the numbers of animals analysed rather than the frequency of the mutations; most mice had InsG in the spermatozoa and only a few had InsG in their livers.

We consider these results to give evidence of significant role of sexual reproduction in the early phases of colonization and prevalence of clonal growth and competitive exclusion of less adapted genotypes in the later ones.

A correlation cutoff of 95% for confirmation or exclusion of clonal identity of analyzed strains was applied as recommended by the manufacturer.

The difference was most evident prior to exclusion of potentially clonal mutants with spermatozoa exhibiting markedly higher numbers of InsG than the liver.

Prior to exclusion of possible clonal mutations, frequencies of InsGs in cauda spermatozoa were 6 14 times higher than in the liver (Table 3; in cauda spermatozoa within the range 23.0 46.2% and in liver 3.4 3.8%).

Following exclusion of such possibly clonal mutations in cauda spermatozoa there were 35 (untreated), 45 (B[a]P), and 52 (corn oil) mutations.

This difference was not due to an effect of the genotype on the number of neurosphere-forming cells or cell viability, as shown by clonal assays (Fig. 3B) and PI exclusion (supplementary material Table S1), respectively.

Analysis of the expressed vir repertoire in natural infections from individual parasites demonstrated that there is no allelic exclusion of vir genes and no clonal expression of VIR proteins at the surface of individually infected reticulocytes [ 9].

We also conclude that the massive population-level mutation supply in combination with clonal interference leads to the soft sweeps observed, but not to the exclusion of an occasional hard sweep.

The recent in vitro evolution experiment of Maharjan et al. (2006, 2012) has disproven the competitive exclusion principle for large populations in the laboratory and demonstrates that a clonal population of Escherichia coli evolving in a chemostat can diversify into a number of subpopulations.