Sentence examples for clinicians reasoning from inspiring English sources

What this book adds to these important issues is that it demonstrates considerable variability in the rationales toward application of the principle of medical futility, and variation in the way in which resource constraints effect the clinicians' reasoning.

Despite these limitations, using physical simulation as a vehicle for improving the fidelity (and thus representativeness) of clinical scenarios is a promising approach to eliciting and evaluating clinicians' reasoning and judgements.

These models allow weighting different combinations of symptoms and signs and, when using concomitant variables as we propose, taking into account variables that change the a priori probabilities, simulating the clinician reasoning.

Cognitive support to clinicians refers to maximizing clinicians' cognitive abilities to improve clinical reasoning and decision-making with the aid of information technology [ 85].

This study aims to evaluate the impact of a clinical education intervention designed to enhance the use of clinical practice guidelines and develop clinicians' clinical reasoning abilities.

The role of judgment may be acknowledged, but resources are not made available to aid clinicians in reasoning through complex problems.

This agenda includes strengthening the metacognitive abilities of clinicians, fostering intuitive reasoning and increasing awareness of the role of systems in the diagnostic process.

Current and future innovative informatics tools such as patient monitoring, better documentation, better visualization and population-based decision support embedded in EHR systems can facilitate clinicians' high-level reasoning.

In practice, caveats render visible tacit knowledge in standardized outcome measures: the manner in which clinicians' intuitive judgment, reasoning, and expertise are used to supplement, dismiss, or adjust scores [ 27].

In addition to lack of awareness of the impact of bias in clinical reasoning, clinicians' overconfidence in their own judgements may be one of the most powerful factors preventing debiasing.

That is because it is harder to systematically determine a clinician's diagnostic reasoning and then evaluate the appropriateness of the corresponding test selection.