Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
This demonstrates that statistical outputs, while crucial to any analysis, may be less important than therapeutic effort in making clinical policy decisions.
Understanding the range of different treatment alternatives, as well as their associated benefits, costs, and uncertainty, can make trade-offs in clinical policy decisions more explicit.
We take such an approach elsewhere (Riley et al, 2003b), but for the purposes of this feasibility study it is clear that no firm clinical policy decisions can be made from our evidence-based review.
Similar(57)
Conclusions: Systematic reviews of diagnostic interventions support clinical and policy decisions, the development of practice guidelines, clinical audit, technology assessment, economic evaluations, education and training, and identify gaps in our knowledge for future research.
HRQL results provide a broad measure of treatment impact from the patient and family perspective and are crucial to guiding clinical and policy decisions.
When systematic reviews are used to inform clinical or policy decisions, it is important to know the efficacy effectiveness nature of the included trials.
Second, they ignore the varying perspective of those using RCT results to make clinical and policy decisions in the real world.
Using the debate over the appropriateness of introducing universal white-cell reduction as an example, this review describes 2 perspectives for assessing evidence and/or making clinical or policy decisions: the evidence-based approach and the precautionary-principle approach; and also considers whether decisions in transfusion medicine can be truly evidence based.
The construction of an EAC simulation model will furthermore provide the necessary foundation for cost-effectiveness analyses which can inform clinical and policy decisions.
Proxy bias might have serious implications for clinical and policy decisions.
The patient's perspective is becoming increasingly important in clinical and policy decisions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com