Sentence examples for clearly questionable from inspiring English sources

ESPN has hesitated to deploy the K Zone to question clearly questionable calls or to harangue the umpires; rather, it is used as the analyst Joe Morgan's educational tool and is said to be accurate to within four-tenths of an inch.

Republican charges range from clearly questionable actions to seemingly specious allegations, and they grow by the day.

This strategy, however, seems clearly questionable as a dating platform without women offers men no reason to become paying users on.

The president's personal grasp of cybersecurity is clearly questionable — a poor reputation that has not been improved in recent days by his appointment of Rudy Giuliani as an advisor in such a crucial area, either.

ESPRIT, however, assumes a uniform evolutionary rate over the entire length of split proteins, something that is clearly questionable in the general case.

These sorts of exchanges are very telling because for years Facebook has relied upon people not knowing or really understanding how its platform works to keep what are clearly ethically questionable practices from closer scrutiny.

In a statement addressing the report, Alan Applonie, president of Taylor Farms Pacific, said International Labor Rights Forum's "credibility and objectivity clearly is questionable at best," given past donations from the Teamsters.

The difference between these stage moms and Lil Poopy's father is that while many of the moms clearly have questionable parenting habits (which very likely could do emotional harm that will haunt their daughters later in life) they are not doing anything illegal with their kids.

Both clearly rely on questionable causal attributions based on partial co-occurrence with substance or medication use or full co-occurrence with another medical condition.

Each MRI feature was classified as absent or questionable, clearly present, or severe.

As a final comment, our original submission took over 6 months to be rejected, with the journal ultimately failing to fairly re-evaluate the published paper (Kiriakidou et al) [ 1] that was clearly based on questionable interpretations.