Sentence examples for clearly defined evaluation from inspiring English sources

Unfortunately, developing a test suite for evaluating competing search algorithms is difficult without clearly defined evaluation goals.

However, to make the results revealed by evaluations of comprehensive interventions more comparable, a model with clearly defined evaluation categories is needed.

The availability of a clearly defined evaluation framework using agreed evaluation characteristics will both provide a sound and reproducible basis for analysis of the extent to which a data collection can be used for a particular purpose and for comparison of data collections.

According to Boyle et al., the rational systems approach understands the organisation as having '(1) a visible set of hierarchical authority relations in which (2) work activities are governed by formal rules and clearly defined criteria for evaluation, relations that (3) are designed to pursue some set of goals.' (2001: 31).

This has been clearly defined for the evaluation of treatment in table 1.

The flow of funds is closely linked to performance and progress, measured according to clearly defined monitoring and evaluation procedures.

The main argument for this prediction is that larger firms tend to have more efficient and transparent human resource management, including clearly defined pay scales and job evaluation criteria.

Studies were included if they considered the format of an evaluation tool, clearly defined dependent (overall student ratings) and independent variables and reported how they were related to each other.

Our study introduced new methodological aspects such as a more exhaustive assessment of potential overt or occult liver hypoperfusion, a more clearly defined resuscitation protocol, and simultaneous evaluation of lactate and sorbitol clearances.

We note that designs that are better suited to the evaluation of clearly defined and static interventions may be adopted without giving sufficient attention to the challenges associated with the dynamic nature of improvement interventions and their interactions with contextual factors.

Furthermore, the sequence of the clinical evaluation was not clearly defined and it is not evident if the investigator or patient was already informed about further test results or differential diagnoses.