A common problem people face with personal finance is a lack of clear cut rules for financial success.
What was clear, was the fact that this was a traumatic brain injury, and there are no clear cut "rules" on recovery.
Before inviting employees' dogs to work, establish some clear cut rules to minimize the insanity.
The proposal would establish a clear-cut rule: if there's no majority stake, the board controls the company.
"In my view, it would be better to adopt a clear-cut rule to the effect that a warrant should not be required to seize and search any personal property found in an automobile that may in turn be seized and searched without a warrant pursuant to Carroll and Chambers". Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753, 769, 772, 99 S.Ct.
Employers would like a clear-cut rule absolving them from the responsibility of choosing an annuity provider, say, by granting a safe harbor if the insurance company has a satisfactory credit rating, but given the recent track record of rating agencies, this particular rule is unlikely to be adopted.
I continue to think the Court is in error and that it would have been better, see 442 U.S., at 772, 99 S.Ct., at 2597, "to adopt a clear-cut rule to the effect that a warrant should not be required to seize and search any personal property found in an automobile that may in turn be seized and searched without a warrant pursuant to Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct.
In general, an editor accepts a manuscript for publication in ACP, if – similar to the "clear-cut" rule of the journal AC-IE [23] – all reviewers rate the manuscript favorably (see here http://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/review/ms_evaluation_criteria.html).html
As the reviewers usually recommend that a submission should be published if it is in their opinion important, the above-mentioned "clear-cut rule" at AC-IE results in most cases in an unambiguous assignment of the reviewers' ratings to the editorial decisions.
