clear consequences for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "clear consequences for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the outcomes or effects that result from a specific action or decision. Example: "The new policy will have clear consequences for employees who fail to comply with the guidelines."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

28 human-written examples

Securing the property rights of minorities seems to have no clear consequences for economic growth.That has big and uncomfortable implications.

The Economist

Thus far, most recommendations include better education for students and staff, simplified reporting mechanisms for victims, timely investigations and clear consequences for perpetrators.

The Guardian

This year's objectives, when they are finally published, must link performance to results and have clear consequences for success and failure.

The Guardian

The combination of agricultural robots and the remodelling of crop and tree architecture will have clear consequences for a dwindling pool of itinerant labourers.

The Guardian

"This is a tragedy which must not only be brought to light but must also have clear consequences for the perpetrators," said Stejarel Olaru, a historian working with Mr Oprea at the state institute for studying communist crimes.

The Guardian

"The clear consequences for Iraq failing to disarm peacefully is that Iraq will be disarmed through the use of force," Richard Boucher, the State Department spokesman, said in Washington.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

31 human-written examples

It gives the audience a clear consequence for them not to be scared: they get out of this weird museum.

The Guardian

Dodd-Frank is linking risky behavior to clearer consequences for shareholders and management, such as capital rules, liquidity rules, risk management principles, and counterparty disclosure.

Huffington Post

Reality, of course, is a fairly elastic concept these days, and if there's a flaw in "Miss Sloane," it's that in future years its juicy Machiavellian gamesmanship may not look farfetched but dated — a throwback to a time when there were clearer consequences for professional misconduct, when people still retained their capacity for outrage.

Los Angeles Times

But for those who don't, "there will be clear consequences from their behaviour".

The Guardian - Opinion

Failure to deliver on these conditions would put the entire peace plan at risk, "with clear consequences – and sanctions" for the Russian side.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For emphasis, pair the phrase with strong verbs that highlight the inevitability of the result, such as 'will face', 'must bear', or 'cannot avoid'.

Common error

Avoid using "clear consequences for" without specifying what those consequences are. Saying "there will be clear consequences" without detailing them can weaken your message. Ensure the consequences are explicitly stated to avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "clear consequences for" functions primarily as a modifier that introduces the results from an action or inaction. This phrase sets expectations about what will result from a particular action. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Academia

7%

Reference

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "clear consequences for" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to emphasize the definite outcomes resulting from particular actions. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is deemed correct and usable in written English. Its primary function is to establish accountability by ensuring that those involved are aware of the tangible repercussions of their behavior. As shown by the examples, this phrase appears in diverse contexts, including news reports, scientific publications, and general guidelines, reflecting its broad applicability. While alternatives such as "definite repercussions for" or "specific outcomes for" exist, "clear consequences for" is direct and widely understood, effectively underscoring the importance of responsibility and accountability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

definite repercussions for

Emphasizes the negative outcomes or effects that follow a particular action; highlights a strong negative impact.

specific outcomes for

Focuses on detailing the precise results or effects that arise from a given situation or action.

unmistakable ramifications for

Highlights the significant and easily identifiable effects that spread out from a particular action or event.

evident results for

Suggests that the outcomes are plain to see and directly attributable to a specific cause or action.

plain accountability for

Stresses the responsibility and the straightforward consequences that individuals or entities must face for their actions.

certain penalties for

Highlights the imposed punishments or sanctions that are guaranteed to occur if certain rules or laws are violated.

predictable effects on

Emphasizes that the consequences are anticipated and can be reasonably foreseen based on the action taken.

direct impact on

Highlights the immediate and unmediated influence an action has on something or someone.

observable effects on

Focuses on the visible or noticeable changes that occur as a result of something.

tangible impacts on

Implies that the effects can be concretely measured or felt.

FAQs

How can I use "clear consequences for" in a sentence?

You can use "clear consequences for" to emphasize the direct and understandable outcomes of a particular action. For example, "The new policy will have clear consequences for those who violate the code of conduct."

What are some alternatives to using "clear consequences for"?

Alternatives include "definite repercussions for", "specific outcomes for", or "unmistakable ramifications for", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "clear consequences for" or "clear consequences of"?

"Clear consequences for" is used to indicate who or what will experience the consequences, while "clear consequences of" refers to the actions or events that cause the consequences. For instance, "clear consequences for students" versus "clear consequences of cheating."

How can I ensure that the "clear consequences for" are effectively communicated?

Make sure the consequences are explicitly stated, easily understood, and consistently applied. Use clear and direct language to avoid any ambiguity. Also, ensure there are "clear reasons for" the consequences, to make it more logical.