Sentence examples for clause without from inspiring English sources
No, the phrase "clause without" is not correct
It does not have a clear meaning that can be used in written English. To use a phrase like this correctly you would need to give an example to explain what you mean. For example, "I changed the contract to exclude the clause without further consultation". Here, "clause without" means a clause that has been removed from the contract.
Greinke acknowledged that on Sunday by waiving his no-trade clause without asking for anything in return.
The government announced the "anti-advocacy clause" without consultation in February, presenting the proposal as a ban on taxpayers' funds being used for political lobbying.
Mr. Bush acted last December after lawyers at the State Department concluded he was within his rights to withdraw from the treaty, under its termination clause, without Senate approval.
The Guild's platform contained six main negotiating points, including a minimum annual salary of $7,500, the right to arbitrated salary negotiation, half of the purchase price on all player sales and a vaguely worded codicil that contracts not be "one-sided," a shot at the reserve clause without saying as much, for Murphy feared overreaching out of the gate.
You can't remove the "that" clause without changing the meaning of the sentence.
In Mayrinax, middle/tough predicates may subcategorize for a non-finite complement clause without an AV-only restriction.
Some leases may even allow neighbours in your building to enforce lease clauses without involving the freeholder.
Hiley found the board "misconstrued the code [of conduct]" in its deliberations and applied clauses without "the existence of any expert or other evidence which could possible give that provision any content and relevance".
In his supreme court decision Justice Hiley found the board "misconstrued the code [of conduct]" in its deliberations and applied clauses without "the existence of any expert or other evidence which could possibly give that provision any content and relevance".
Currently Bates said private landlords under shorthold contracts were allowed to evict tenants under no fault clauses without worrying about human rights obligations but this would change instantly if Wednesdat's judgment was backed by the court of appeal.
Nonetheless, clauses without purpose make courts twitchy, and thus in the Argentine litigation, both the Federal District Court in Manhattan and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit have stretched to read the clause as a kind of prohibition on paying one equal rank creditor before another.
