Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Both biomarkers were ineffective at classifying stage IA patients (three-gene biomarker: HR 0.86, P = 0.710, 52% accuracy; six-gene biomarker (Additional file 5): HR 0.69, P = 0.42, 50% accuracy).
Similar(59)
They used Bayesian, k-NN, and SVM classifiers for classifying stages of the cancer.
Patients underwent endoscopic procedures for classifying, staging and grading of the esophageal cancer.
Clinical indicators were found to best classify stage of disease.
Tanaka further classified stage 3 into stages 3a and 3b.
The lesion in the stomach is often classified stage I (62 %).
All but two tumors were classified stage IVa.
We also implemented a simple search and classify stage.
Hence, almost 80% of patients in our group were classified stage 1.
According to the Brombat classification [ 6], 3 cases were classified stage III, and 31 cases stage IV.
Srivastava et al. [6] studied a group of 178 patients with RCC and found that sub-classifying stage I RCC into tumors smaller than and equal to 4 cm and larger than 4 cm did not reveal any statistically significant difference (P = 0.32) in prognosis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com