Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(31)
Ways of classifying people have proliferated on the Web.
As old as America, as China, as classifying people by a color.
And this court very clearly said, No, you're classifying people; and that classification has to be justified.
In classifying people as either privileged or underprivileged, it looked at their schooling and their socio-economic status.
Scientists have always had difficulty classifying people into groups on the basis of variation, and the reason is simple.
Classifying people by race would also encourage discrimination, not prevent it, and reduce identity to "criteria from another era, that of colonial France, or Vichy".
Similar(27)
"Why classify people?" Rampling insists.
"Why classify people?" she reportedly said.
City Islanders have their own idiom to classify people.
"You don't classify people by their sexual orientation.
He classified people as either "solid" or "suckers".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com