Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
classify significant
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "classify significant" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to the act of categorizing or identifying something that is important or noteworthy, but it lacks clarity and context. Example: "We need to classify significant data points to better understand the trends in our research."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Cancer Imaging
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
In our case, our threshold aim at classify significant tumour change not knowing the performance at classifying patients responses.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
We classified significant SNPs <50 Mb from causative SNPs as true positives and excluded SNPs >50 Mb when calculating FDR.
Science
The strength of the coevolutionary pattern was calculated by classifying significant MIC values into the categories (0.1, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.50, MIC > 0.50).
Science
To estimate the false discovery rate from simulations, we classified significant SNPs not located on the same chromosome as one of the causative SNPs as false positives.
Science
Still, the two-side Fisher's exact test and xtest were used to classify the significant pathways, and the threshold of significance was defined by p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05.
Science
We employed DAVID to classify the significant hyperoxia-responsive mRNAs into functionally related clusters.
Science
HA was used to correctly classify between significant fibrosis and early cirrhosis, indicating an assembling of ECM at the late stage of fibrosis.
Science
Indirect serum NITs, such as APRI and FIB-4, fail to classify a significant proportion of patients who fall into the gray zone of indeterminate values.
Science
The improvement in using amplitude rather than ranked time-series data to classify was significant (t = 3.44, df = 11, P < 0.005).
Science
Such losses were classified as significant losses (10-19%) and very significant (20% and above).
Science
Conventionally, a p-value smaller than.05 is classified as "significant evidence", a p-value smaller than.01 is called "very significant evidence", etc.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Instead of using the grammatically awkward phrase "classify significant", opt for clearer and more precise alternatives such as "categorize important", "identify key", or "distinguish crucial" to ensure effective communication.
Common error
Be mindful of combining verbs and adjectives in ways that don't align with standard grammatical conventions. Using phrases like "classify significant" can confuse readers. Ensure your phrasing is grammatically sound to maintain clarity.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "classify significant" attempts to combine a verb ("classify") with an adjective ("significant") intending to describe the action of categorizing something of importance. However, this construction is not grammatically sound in standard English.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "classify significant" is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity, even though it appears in some scientific contexts. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is not correct. It attempts to convey the categorization of important elements but fails to do so effectively. Alternatives such as "categorize important", "identify key", and "distinguish crucial" are more appropriate. Predominantly found in scientific sources, the phrase's infrequent usage and grammatical issues make it a poor choice for formal or professional communication. Therefore, it's best to opt for clearer and grammatically sound alternatives.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
categorize important
Replaces "classify" with "categorize" while keeping "important" as a synonym for "significant".
identify key
Uses "identify" instead of "classify", focusing on recognizing essential aspects.
distinguish crucial
Emphasizes the act of differentiating what's vital using "distinguish crucial".
sort relevant
Suggests arranging items based on relevance.
group noteworthy
Focuses on assembling items that are worthy of attention.
label impactful
Highlights the action of assigning labels to elements with considerable impact.
separate meaningful
Focuses on segregating that is meaningful.
arrange prominent
Suggests organizing elements that are particularly noticeable or important.
catalog essential
Implies creating a detailed list of items that are absolutely necessary.
index substantial
Refers to creating an index of items that are considerable or significant in size or importance.
FAQs
What is a grammatically correct alternative to "classify significant"?
Instead of "classify significant", use phrases like "categorize important", "identify key", or "distinguish crucial" for better grammatical accuracy and clarity. For example, instead of saying "We need to classify significant data points", try "We need to categorize important data points".
How can I use "categorize important" instead of "classify significant"?
Use "categorize important" to emphasize the process of grouping items based on their importance. For instance, "Let's "categorize important" findings separately".
What does it mean to "identify key" elements, and how does it relate to "classify significant"?
"Identify key" means to recognize and highlight the most essential elements. Instead of attempting to "classify significant" data, focus on actions that involve recognizing the data's relevance or importance to a context such as "identify key" trends.
When is it appropriate to use "distinguish crucial" instead of "classify significant"?
"Distinguish crucial" is suitable when you want to emphasize the act of differentiating what's vital from what is not. For example, "It's important to "distinguish crucial" factors from minor ones".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested