Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Furthermore, 140 of 184 of the surgeons' blinded re-codings (76%) were correctly classified (Tables 1 and 2).
In forest soils, the dominant subgroups were 3, 16, 6, 1, and 4, representing 7.0, 3.0, 2.9, 2.9, and 2.1%, respectively, of all sequences that were classified (Tables S6 and S7).
The search results are output in classified tables of detailed dynamic information that support ascending and descending sorting and have symbols like gene name or PubMed ID hyperlinked to the original sources.
Similar(56)
The expectation was confirmed, this case resulted also in the high rate of correctly classified images, 91 % of the images were correctly classified (Table 3).
The bacterial strains Paenibacillus sp. 32A (DSM 27214) and Microbacterium sp. 40A (DSM 27211) were isolated and classified (Table 1).
Two of these genes, Tm7sf3 and Tspan8, could not be functionally classified (Table 4).
For some metagenome types less than 1% of the viral metagenomic sequences could be classified (Table 1, Table S1) resulting in relatively few sequences per metagenome for comparing communities.
A total of 24,095 cancers were classified (Table 1).
On the validation group, patients were 100% correctly classified (Table 3).
In total, 67.2% of the participants were successfully classified (table 2).
We found that, overall, these genes have been properly classified (Table 1, Additional file 1: Table S4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com