Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
These parameters were analyzed after having classified BIS values in three groups (<40 heavy sedation; 40 ≤ BIS ≤ 60 acceptable sedation; >60 light sedation).
These parameters were analyzed after having classified BIS values into three groups.
Similar(57)
Of note, 6 out of 9 malignant lesions missed by dynamic optical breast imaging had been classified BI-RADS score 5 by mammography.
A group of 177 breast lesions that were classified BI-RADS®-US 3 were additionally examined with real-time sonoelastography.
Lesions of the breast that are classified BI-RADS®-US 3 by ultrasound are probably benign and observation is recommended, although malignancy may occasionally occur.
The recommendation within the Dutch health system is that women should return to the screening programme if the suspicion of breast cancer has been ruled out by additional imaging or invasive procedures (mammographic abnormality classified BI-RADS 1 or 2).
The opportunity of sub-classifying BI-RADS 4 is that low-risk 4A lesions may clinically be evaluated separately and followed rather than immediately biopsied as is done for most 4B and 4C lesions.
A diagnosis of fibrosis with chronic inflammation is usually acceptable in lesions with no mass effect classified as BI-RADS 3 to BI-RADS 4a.
Three hundred and ten patients with suspicious and highly suggestive of malignancy mammographically found non-palpable breast lesions, classified as BI-RADS 4 and BI-RADS 5, who underwent mammographically guided needle excision biopsy were evaluated.
All patients with suspicious and highly suggestive of malignancy non-palpable breast lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 and BI-RADS 5 underwent pre-operative mammographically guided breast lesion localization with a Kopan breast localization needle (19G, 9 cm length) [ 37].
Breast lesions that MRI classified as BI-RADS 2 were considered benign and BI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions were considered positive for malignancy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com