Exact(1)
Thyroid cancer histological classifications were coded using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition (ICD-O-3).
Similar(59)
In cases of disagreement, the most accurate classification was coded in consultation with a third researcher.
Identification of the health workforce is possible when the classification is coded to a degree of detail that minimally corresponds to the three-digit level, and preferably to the four-digit level for distinction of practitioner specializations.
Codes included 23 verbal modes of behaviour (8 with content classification) which were coded as they occurred.
Two other forms, HC and NDPH, did not appear in the IHS classification [4] but were included in the ICHD-2 classification [15], where they were coded to Group 4 "Other primary headaches".
Correct pitch identification did not require accurate octave classification and semitone errors were coded as incorrect for all participants.
In addition to the researcher classification, each answer was coded individually by two different coders to achieve reliable categorization.
The International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), is used for cancer classification; gastric cancer is coded as C16.
ITCs within nodes (or distant sites) are not counted in the stage classification and should be coded as N0 (or M0), regardless of node level harbouring the ITC, for example, pN0(i 1) or pN0(mol 1).
23 Prescription data were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification, 24 and morbidity was coded by using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) scheme.
Educational level, obtained from Statistics Norway and following the Norwegian Standard Classification of Education (NUS), was coded into three levels of highest educational level attained: primary (primary and secondary school), secondary (high school or equivalent) and tertiary (college and/or university), primary used as reference category where relevant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com