Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
For the medical immediacy framework, the emergency department physicians collaborated in the development of a five-part ordered classification ranging from least to most immediate and a set of associated decision rules.
The sets of pictures used were identical to the sets used by Helm et al. [21], covering pictures with valence scores ranging from 1.45 (negative) to 8.28 (positive) and arousal scores from 2.28 (low) to 7.12 (high), according to the standard IAPS classification (ranging from 1 to 9).
For all other non-service connected care, veterans' level of cost sharing is determined by priority group classification, ranging from 1 (highest priority) through 8 (lowest priority).
Mean maximum 8-hr average O3 concentrations across all years were similar when stratified by urbanicity classification, ranging from 43.5 44.8 ppb (Table 1).
Specifically, better model fit was suggested by a lower Akaike information criterion (31); a lower Bayesian information criterion (32); a significant Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test, suggesting the more complex model (i.e., model with more groups) fits the data better than the model with fewer groups (33); and entropy, the estimate of certainty of classification (ranging from 0 to 1).
Similar(55)
Kappa coefficient obtained from the classification, ranges from 89.17 to 92.68 %.
Accuracy of the classification ranges from 87 to 92 % indicating consistent classification results.
At study entry, their CDC-defined HIV disease classification ranged from A1-C3.
Overall accuracy of the classification ranged from 87% in Wioso and Akutuase to 95% in Obenimase.
Seven specific domains (ease of use, clarity, exclusiveness of categories, inclusiveness of classification, possibility of using classification prospectively, reproducibility and requirements for implementation) were graded (2 = good; 1 = median; 0 = poor).The final grade of each classification ranged from 0 to 14, the higher the grading the better the classification.
The load sharing classification ranged from 4 to 7 points with an average rating of 5 ± 1.15.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com