classification of results

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "classification of results" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the organization or categorization of data or findings from research or analysis. Example: "The classification of results from the experiment revealed significant trends in the data."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The usual classification of results of animal carcinogenicity tests is positive or negative.

Environmental Health Perspectives

According to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, classification of results depends only on median ratings and the presence or absence of disagreement.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

The classification of results into virological or nonvirological failures is done by using the site-specific threshold Ct-value corresponding to either 5,000 copies/mL (for both plasma and DBS) or 1,000 copies per mL (for plasma only).

BioMed Research International

Note: When results of one trial were used in predictive classification of results from the other trial, the accuracy in cross-validation was 86% and 77% for the training and testing set, respectively (with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.5507).

BMC Cancer

Since, agreements of pair wise comparison of tests (Kappa statistics) within species were generally better when all doubtful results were classified negative than as positives, for binary classification of results, doubtful sera were classified as negative for all tests, although the best agreement between two serological tests was only a moderate agreement (Kappa < 0.6).

EcoHealth

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Allergens and classifications of results of three MAST assays are summarized in Table 1.

BioMed Research International

HRA contributed to the planning of the study, data collection (exposure classification), interpretation of results and drafting of the manuscript.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

The classifications of resulting landslide susceptibility index maps were carried out in such a way so that 20% of the LSZ map area using AHP and FR includes 97%and76%6% of the landslides respectively.

Geoenvironmental Disasters

We also examined whether the new technique resulted in a more reliable classification of reduction results for distal radius fractures.

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Table 2 Classification of the results of the experienced and inexperienced readers and the software analysis.

Insights into Imaging

We also report the range of individual-level posterior probabilities for each classification of MIC results, positive, negative, or zero.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing scientific reports, clearly define the criteria used for the "classification of results" to ensure transparency and reproducibility.

Common error

Avoid using vague or undefined categories when presenting the "classification of results". Ensure that each category is distinct and well-justified by the data.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "classification of results" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It refers to the act or process of categorizing or grouping outcomes, findings, or data. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "classification of results" is a grammatically correct and usable noun phrase predominantly found in scientific and academic writing. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it serves the purpose of organizing and presenting data in a structured manner. While alternatives like "categorization of findings" or "interpretation of outcomes" exist, the original phrase remains a clear and effective choice for formal reporting. Remember to clearly define your classification criteria for clarity and reproducibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

categorization of outcomes

Focuses on the process of placing results into categories.

categorization of findings

Emphasizes the organization of research findings.

interpretation of outcomes

Highlights the understanding and explanation of results.

analysis of findings

Stresses the detailed examination of results.

grouping of results

Indicates the arrangement of results into specific groups.

organization of outcomes

Focuses on structuring the results in a coherent manner.

sorting of results

Highlights the process of arranging results in a particular order.

arrangement of outcomes

Emphasizes the structured placement of results.

grading of results

Refers to assigning grades or scores to results based on criteria.

evaluation of findings

Highlights the assessment and judgment of the value or significance of results.

FAQs

How can I use "classification of results" in a research paper?

In a research paper, "classification of results" is used to categorize and present your findings in a structured manner. For example, you might say, "The classification of results showed a significant correlation between variable A and variable B".

What are some alternatives to "classification of results"?

Alternatives include "categorization of findings", "interpretation of outcomes", or "analysis of findings". The best choice depends on the specific context.

How does "classification of results" differ from "interpretation of results"?

"Classification of results" focuses on grouping results into categories, while "interpretation of results" involves explaining the meaning and significance of those results. The former is about organization, the latter is about understanding.

Is it appropriate to use "classification of results" in a formal report?

Yes, "classification of results" is perfectly appropriate for formal reports, especially in scientific or technical contexts. It provides a clear and structured way to present complex data.