Sentence examples for classification of journal from inspiring English sources
Furthermore, in the absence of any accepted, evidence-based classification of journal quality, we also included whether the journal for each trial's primary report was in the Abridged Index Medicus (AIM) in a sensitivity analysis.
We suggest three general drawbacks of the classification of journals according to their degree of generality and their Impact Factor.
Second, the AAT expresses the classification of journals at various levels of granularity to which the structural features of our map can be compared.
Third, the classification of journals according to a gradient of generality, as denoted by their Impact Factors, and the fact that these Impact Factors are often considered as an index of intrinsic scientific quality might be counterproductive.
The agreement between the reviewers regarding classification of journals was 95% (weighted kappa value of 0.89).
As previously noted, an important limitation of the Scopus classification of journals is that many species-specific articles are published in MISC journals (which comprised the largest group), as well as in journals in related subject areas.
This paper reports on a large experiment in the classification of journals in HSS carried out in Italy in the 2012 2014 period for the National Scientific Habilitation (Abilitazione Scientifica Nazionale; ASN).
We assign disciplines to an article according to the JSTOR classification of the journal; approximately half of the journals are assigned to just one discipline, while the rest have multiple assigned disciplines.
The results show that independent classifications of journals may be considered as good predictors of the score assigned to individual articles.
Using a very large dataset of journal articles published in HSS, the paper proves that independent classifications of journals may be considered as good predictors of the score assigned to individual articles.
For example, it is possible that the correlation between reviewers' evaluations is rather low, and that the quality classification of a journal can be manipulated (e.g., by coalitions).
