Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
First, as stated previously, the classification of imaging results into positive or negative is an oversimplification of clinical practice.
A possible explanation for this discrepancy is the fact that the classification of imaging results into positive or negative is an oversimplification of clinical practice.
The BI-RADS® classification (breast imaging reporting and data system) of the ACR American College of Radiologyy) provides a standardised classification of imaging findings according to the likelihood of malignancy.
Similar(57)
These data support the feasibility of multiinstitutional classification of radiologic imaging text reports with a single machine learning classifier without requiring institution-specific training data.
However, the current FIGO classification acknowledges the use of imaging methods as an adjunct for cervical cancer staging, and a number of studies have shown that imaging, especially MRI, is superior to clinical examination alone for correctly evaluating cervical carcinoma stage [3, 4, 5, 6, 7].
Although individual features may differ subtly between TCFA and other fibroatheroma on VH-IVUS and OCT, plaque classification uses a combination of imaging features to define plaque type as compared with standard histological definitions.
Furthermore, another objective was to assess the relative importance of imaging modalities in classification of A β+/A β− early MCI.
As a secondary goal, we assessed the relative importance of imaging modalities in classification of F-AV45-positive versus F-AV45-negative early-MCI individuals.
Results indicate the general feasibility of CNN-based computer-aided systems for diagnosis and classification of images generated by medical imaging systems.
Zarogianni, E., Moorhead, T. W. & Lawrie, S. M. Towards the identification of imaging biomarkers in schizophrenia, using multivariate pattern classification at a single-subject level.
The main purpose of imaging algorithms is to achieve enough resolution to make the classification step easy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com