Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
The classification of effect sizes (f) was determined by calculating partial eta-squared (eta).
Furthermore, VanderWeele and Robins [ 22] provided a structural classification of effect modification by using DAGs.
Cohen [ 63] proposed a threefold classification of effect sizes: small (0.20 - 0.49), medium (0.50 - 0.79), and large (0.80 and above).
Using Cohen's classification of effect sizes, 31 effect size was small for smoking behaviour and attitudes, while there was a medium effect on smoking-related knowledge.
Therefore, instead of using significance criterion, we used Cohen's classification of effect sizes for interpretation and focused only on correlations of 0.5 or higher which are considered strong [ 23].
The classification of effect size (ES) was determined by calculating partial η p 2. According to Cohen [ 22] ES can be classified as small (0.00 ≤ ES ≤ 0.24), medium (0.25 ≤ ES ≤ 0.39), and large (ES ≥ 0.40).
Similar(51)
We have also observed cases where the allele effects split into multiple classes or where the classification of effects into discrete clusters is not clear.
However, in practice, the prenatal developmental toxicity study (OECD test guideline 414; OECD 2001a) is needed to apply the criteria for developmental toxicity, and the two-generation reproduction toxicity study (OECD test guideline 416; OECD 2001b) is needed for classification of effects on fertility (Ohlsson A, Swedish Chemicals Agency, personal communication).
Table 5 Classification of decomposition effects Production effect (PE Negative Positive Technologyogy effect (TCE) Zero Emission ↓ Emission ↑ PE dominant Negative |TCE| > |PE| Emission ↓ Emission ↓ TCE dominant |TCE| < |PE| Emission ↓ Emission ↑ PE dominant.
An increase in number of taxa would refine both the classification of CpG effect genes and also the assignment of ranks to individual human CpG dinucleotides.
Additionally, it provides various statistics on the set of paths linking two signaling nodes as well as a classification of the effect of each path as either coherent or incoherent (e.g. [ 23]).
More suggestions(17)
rating of effect
categorization of effect
classes of effect
categories of effect
classification of impacts
ordering of effect
classification of freak
classification of government
classification of project
classification of crystalline
classification of injury
classification of novel
classification of glyphosate
classification of breast
classification of protein
classification of risk
classification of competition
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com